User:Rmhermen
This user has been editing Wikipedia for more than ten years. |
Admin
[edit]I am a Wikipedia:administrator since July 5, 2004. I first contributed to Wikipedia in April of 2001 (oldest edits lost in early software upgrades). My first edit with my username appears to be on April 26. I have been active on a number of online projects - active and passive (SETI@Home, Distributed Proofreaders, Mars crater labeling, Stardust@Home, Folding@Home on the Wikipedia team: Team page, etc.)
Action | Count |
---|---|
Edits | 61490 |
Edits+Deleted | 64846 |
Pages deleted | 3958 |
Revisions deleted | 14 |
Pages restored | 30 |
Pages protected | 80 |
Pages unprotected | 9 |
Protections modified | 23 |
Users blocked | 101 |
Users reblocked | 1 |
User rights modified | 1 |
Administrative backlog
[edit]Reports
[edit]- 64.88.204.172 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 926 (Image vandalism II, details). Note: Please carefully consider context before blocking. Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 14:06, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
- Interstatefan2532 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 926 (Image vandalism II, details). Note: Please carefully consider context before blocking. Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 14:10, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
- 89.197.37.122 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 14:52, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
- 193.115.194.132 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 15:28, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
- 81.83.86.15 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 15:51, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
- Gayle157 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 16:06, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
- 72.48.215.133 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 926 (Image vandalism II, details). Note: Please carefully consider context before blocking. Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 18:32, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
- 190.15.138.253 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 18:34, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
User-reported
[edit]- 24.51.233.15 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) keeps vandalizing content despites repeated warning since 2021 SophieWMCA (talk) 15:35, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
- 204.28.99.65 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – vandalism after final warning. See also filter log. Annh07 (talk) 15:37, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
- 125.143.8.193 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) Vandalism after final warning. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 14:16, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
- 174.200.79.90 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – On Rockingham County, Virginia (diff): vandalism after final warning. Adding incorrect information. {{unblock-un on hold}} (talk) 14:23, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
- Stale report. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 14:25, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
- 73.0.15.129 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) Mass marking of pages of > 10 lawyers and law firms with one or more of CSD/PROD/Advert Tag/Promo Tag. I reverted many, but it may continue and I might not have caught them all. Ldm1954 (talk) 15:30, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
- 2404:160:8154:A2EC:181B:36C5:CEEC:10BB (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – WP:BLOCKEVASION, see 2404:160:805B:3162:181B:3390:B818:C3CE. Annh07 (talk) 16:48, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
- MudBurgers 2005 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – On Rapture's Delight: vandalism after final warning. Persistent (attempted) copyright violations and failure to engage with messages left at their Talk page. Also appear to be editing as 108.6.54.155 (talk · contribs). DonIago (talk) 17:41, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
- EdsonCordeirodeSouza (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) Persistent disruptive editing and edit warring, including incorrect information and literally breaking a link, no communication whatsoever, even after multiple warnings on their talk page. Seems like this is not the first time either, based on their previous talk page warnings. Magitroopa (talk) 17:43, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
- 2600:4040:52C8:BA01:A516:4CEE:CFCA:52F0 (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – On Thu Nguyen: vandalism after final warning. BLP breaking; changing pronouns of non-binary person. ☩ (Babysharkboss2) 18:16, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
- 148.252.147.110 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – On Clara Amfo (diff): vandalism after final warning. See Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Frenchie vandal. Recently blocked as Special:Contributions/148.252.144.128, still blocked as Special:Contributions/148.252.145.209. Binksternet (talk) 18:22, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
- Andersholmquestatgmaildotcom (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Barfrestonreupdate (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- This username matched "barf" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 22:40, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
- CoderSchoolMontgomery (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Prosanjitdhar (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- This username matched "Used i instead of l attempting to skip filter: (ltd|pty). Violating string: prosanjltdhar" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 04:40, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
- Note on file Usernames containing this string are often promotional in nature - check if this is the case -- DQB (owner / report) 04:40, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
- LEOOFFICIAL1 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Natusernameramos (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Netproagency (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
User-reported
[edit]- Yo mama so fat she ate The sigma (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as an offensive username. Johnj1995 (talk) 16:53, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
- Wait until the user edits. Others may disagree, but I don't think this is offensive enough to block without having edited. 331dot (talk) 18:03, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
- I agree that no-edit blocks are for only the worst of the worst, hate speech, blatant profanity, etc. Beeblebrox Beebletalks 23:30, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
- I also agree. But my personal belief is that for the really deeply offensive no-edit usernames, WMF should have a policy of deleting them entirely, so they never even appear in our username lists. I did a count a few years back, and there are around 170 offensively-named blocked accounts listed using the 'N'-word, plus a similar number using the 'C'-word. That we keep them visible just undermines our credibility as a grown-up encyclopaedia. It's maybe different for those accounts that have edited, but this just plays into the hands of those who like to see their racist or offensive terms visible, even when blocked. Nick Moyes (talk) 12:30, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
- I agree that no-edit blocks are for only the worst of the worst, hate speech, blatant profanity, etc. Beeblebrox Beebletalks 23:30, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
- Wait until the user edits. Others may disagree, but I don't think this is offensive enough to block without having edited. 331dot (talk) 18:03, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
- Sierra Management (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. GPL93 (talk) 13:59, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
- Mariam.alshamsi (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. SparklingBlueMoon (talk) 18:15, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
- Moonword (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. SparklingBlueMoon (talk) 18:24, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
Current requests for increase in protection level
[edit]Place requests for new or upgrading of article protection, upload protection, or create protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Reason: Continued sockpuppetry. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/TyMega. HorrorLover555 (talk) 06:57, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 08:03, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
- The previous request was denied at 03:39 with the following comment: "Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Since PC was imposed there has been one disruptive edit, and that IP has been blocked." At 05:51, the vandal came back with a new VPN IP and made dozens of nonsense edits. PLEASE SEMI-PROTECT THE PAGE. Everything else is a total waste of our time. — Chrisahn (talk) 10:48, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
- Pinging Daniel Quinlan, who added the PC protection. Isabelle Belato 🏳🌈 12:08, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 17:48, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
Reason: There has been an increasing influx of vandalism from unregistered users. I request the implementation of semi-protection for this page. ItsFeL (talk) 15:19, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Repeated IP edit warring and parts of the article falling under WP:ARBPIA. ~ IvanScrooge98 (talk) 15:53, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
Reason: High traffic and common amounts of IP vandalism. SleepDeprivedGinger (talk) 16:00, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism and new account User_talk:Adarsh_Chinnadan making same disruptive changes of boxoffice number without citing reliable source. Please protect page. IPs and new account have been warned but continue to vandalize again. Please protect page. RangersRus (talk) 17:07, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 17:21, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
Droop quota and related articles
[edit]Indefinite pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – Continuous style-warring and attempts to remove the most-common definition of the Droop quota by an unregistered editor. (Who has kept this up from many different IPs.) IP has repeatedly ignored attempts at explaining this on both the article talk and in a conversation I had with them on my user talk. (The Droop quota is sometimes defined v⁄k+1 and sometimes v+1⁄k+1; user keeps removing or obfuscating the first definition.) Update: unsurprisingly, despite previous decline of page protection because the user hadn't edited for a week or two, they've gone right back to it within 2 days, as they have for the past year—Special:Diff/1269731590.– Closed Limelike Curves (talk) 17:18, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Some IPs are repeatedly removing sourced content from the lead section, along with reliable sources. Aryan{Talk} 17:19, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism. A user is persistently removing all the refs and added informations about kajri. Aman8188 (talk) 17:53, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 18:06, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Persistent unsourced additions by IP addresses since 13:37, 12 December 2024. Alith Anar 18:16, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
Current requests for reduction in protection level
[edit]Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin on their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.
- To find out the username of the admin who protected the page, click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page," which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
- Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
- Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
- If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page, please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected, please use the section below.
Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Reason: The page was protected due to BLP, and is still protected for that reason despite Santos dying in 2022. If the page is to stay protected, the protection reason should be changed. 100.7.34.111 (talk) 16:02, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
- Declined as you have not discussed this with the protecting administrator. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 16:12, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
Reason: The page was protected due to BLP, and is still protected for that reason despite Benedict dying in 2022. If the page is to stay protected, the protection reason should be changed. 100.7.34.111 (talk) 16:02, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
- Declined as you have not discussed this with the protecting administrator. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 16:14, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
Reason: The page was protected due to BLP, and is still protected for that reason despite Carter dying in 2022. If the page is to stay protected, the protection reason should be changed. 100.7.34.111 (talk) 16:03, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
- Declined as you have not discussed with the protecting administrator. As it says at the top of the page when you edit, this section is for removing or reducing the protection level of a page if the protecting admin is inactive or you have already asked them. Please stop posting requests like this when the administrator is active and you have not asked them first. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 16:16, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
- I have had dozens upon dozens of requests approved without the need to ask the protecting administrator. 100.7.34.111 (talk) 17:57, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
Current requests for edits to a protected page
[edit]Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here
Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.
- Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among
{{Edit protected}}
,{{Edit template-protected}}
,{{Edit extended-protected}}
, or{{Edit semi-protected}}
to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed. - Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the
{{Edit COI}}
template should be used. - Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
- If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
- This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.
Add “by June 30, 2024” to the sentence: The Lancet has estimated 70,000 deaths due to traumatic injuries.[8] Seahumidity (talk) 23:09, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
I would like to add more information regarding his legacy. KiddKrazy2 (talk) 21:00, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
- Edit requests should take the form, for example, of change X to Y. What specific edit would you like to be made? — Malcolmxl5 (talk) 22:25, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
- Not done – Please use an edit request to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. Talk:Saddam Hussein is not protected. Favonian (talk) 12:09, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
In paragraph 4 is this assertion: "In private, White House staffers and Biden's family took measures to conceal and compensate for apparent declines in his acuity." There is no source cited for this consequential claim. The "apparent decline" of mental acuity in Biden, a lifetime stutterer, is a topic of contention. Rnperry (talk) 15:10, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
Handled requests
[edit]A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.
2 protected edit requests | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||
Updated as needed. Last updated: 14:32, 16 January 2025 (UTC) |
10 template-protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Updated as needed. Last updated: 17:52, 16 January 2025 (UTC) |
WP:PERM
Requests for autopatrolled |
---|
Autopatrolled[edit]
I've seen this editor's work on multiple occasions at New Page Review. Has created 208 pages, none deleted, more than 3/4 of them B-class. High-quality page creation with infoboxes, quality references with proper formatting, images, etc., requiring no cleanup by reviewers. Dclemens1971 (talk) 17:38, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
I would like to request auto-patrolled rights on Wikipedia. I have been actively contributing to the project and have created more than 30 of articles to date, which adhere to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. I believe my experience and attention to detail make me a good fit for this role. Granting me auto-patrolled rights would help reduce the workload on other patrollers by automatically marking my new pages as reviewed. Please feel free to review my contributions and articles to ensure they meet the necessary standards. Let me know if any additional information is required. Thank you for considering my request! Needforname (talk) 17:39, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
Reason for requesting autopatrolled rights Ahola .O (talk) 22:56, 11 January 2025 (UTC) I am requesting the autopatrolled user right because I have been actively contributing to Wikipedia and believe that my experience and adherence to Wikipedia's guidelines make me a suitable candidate for this right, I have created over 25 articles, all of which comply with Wikipedia's notability guidelines and content policies. My contributions have consistently aimed to enhance the quality and reliability of the encyclopedia. I believe that granting me the autopatrolled user right will help reduce the workload of new page patrollers and allow me to continue contributing to Wikipedia more efficiently. Thank you for considering my request. Ahola .O (talk)
Reason for requesting autopatrolled rights I have created almost 50 articles and whilst producing these articles I have developed my understanding of wikipedia policies, conformed with the rules for biographies of living persons and have improved the content and formatting of numerous articles. SDGB1217 (talk) 14:46, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
Reason for requesting autopatrolled rights - I had it in the past and honestly didn’t realise it was missing until I did a requested move today and the DAB I created had to get manually patrolled. Could I please have this back so as to not add work to others when I’m doing moves related work? Steven Crossin Help resolve disputes! 13:13, 15 January 2025 (UTC) |
Requests for AutoWikiBrowser access |
---|
AutoWikiBrowser[edit] |
Requests for confirmation |
---|
Confirmed[edit]
Reason for requesting confirmed rights: Need to add official logo for a school page and edit the name to the more current/appropriate one Dagoofybloke (talk) 13:57, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
|
Requests for extended confirmation |
---|
Extended confirmed[edit]
I wish to be able to translate articles between the languages I speak, English and Spanish. I have already translated a page, but I want to be able to upload it. FroggyTranslator (talk) 23:00, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
Hello, can i be an Extented Confirmed User? Sr. Blud (talk) 16:22, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
Reason for requesting extended confirmed rights Some pages have ridiculous permissions, and i would like to be able to edit them to legitimately make wikipedia better IDK how to read (talk) 18:16, 16 January 2025 (UTC) |
Requests for new page reviewer |
---|
New page reviewer[edit]
Hello, I would like to apply for New page reviewer rights. I am actively involved in reviewing Recent changes and Pending changes. I have also been reviewing Articles for creation since December 2024. Additionally, I have participated in Articles for deletion discussions. My primary areas of interest include politics, politicians, history, sports and topics related to Sri Lanka. I always strive to explain to editors the reasons for reverting their edits or declining their submissions when addressing their queries. I have also contributed by creating articles in the mainspace and participating in the NPPS programme to enhance my knowledge. Thank you. QEnigma talk 19:59, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
I request renewal of the rights to continue supporting the project effectively.tanks Mohammadkazemm (talk) 15:21, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
I am editing Wikipedia since 10 months and i had created dozens of articles and also participated in deletion discussions and also nominated some articles for AfD and most of them got deleted. Also i exapanded some articles of stub category and my area of interest are Politics, Rajasthan, BLPs, settlement articles, etc. Now i want to work with other editors on New page reviewing and i am requesting for a one month rights, firstly as a trial. TheSlumPanda (talk) 08:06, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
|
Requests for page mover |
---|
Page mover[edit]
Have participated in handful of RMs in past year, as well as at MRV. I've only come to RMTR once, but otherwise would be useful for disambiguation purposes. As I often create the disambig first, in order to justify a page moving away from ptopic; this often leaves me with having to swap the disambig page with the redirect and visa versa afterwards, when I simply need to perform a swap. I've otherwise closed RMs before, and would probably close more that aren't too controversial, but am often restricted due to the need to overwrite a redirect. CNC (talk) 12:54, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
I've been requesting occasional, regular and errant page moves at RMTR ever since I either created this account or achieved the extended-confirmed threshold. After 30 months of existence and persistence and in this new year, I'm ready to take the next step and have this right for a start as I can have an impact on this encyclopaedia. Intrisit (talk) 20:05, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
I'm requesting page mover rights because I want to have the ability, which would help in vandalism patrols and other things. Currently, someone moved a page for basically no reason and I'm trying to move it back, otherwise the page will have no former revision history. Thanks! Ali Beary (talk2me!) (stalk me?!) 13:59, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
Over time, I have made numerous move proposals on talk pages. Sometimes I don't get a reply from other editors and I bring it to WP:RM/TR. Other times, an administrator notices the proposal and implements it. Some of these could probably have been undiscussed bold moves and not required discussion at all. All of them are impossible without the page mover permission because they would overwrite a redirect. I'd rather save y'all the trouble of reviewing and do them myself. I've made 269 page moves and 22 edits at Wikipedia:Requested moves/Technical requests. I was granted this permission once before, but it expired. Daask (talk) 21:30, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
I would like to have the page mover rights, I know how page movement works and the rules regarding page movements. SparklingBlueMoon (talk) 17:58, 16 January 2025 (UTC) SparklingBlueMoon (talk) 17:58, 16 January 2025 (UTC) |
Requests for pending changes reviewer |
---|
Pending changes reviewer[edit]
Hello I'm Ampil. The right set to expire 7 days. I've received a award. and I'm a AfC reviewer. ~🌀 Ampil 「💬 / 📝」 04:39, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
I have lots of experience in the WP:TW scale of reverting edits, and wish to continue this through WP:PENDING BryceM2001 (talk) 20:40, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
I'd like to request pending changes review rights because I am familiar with the policy and this would help me with my vandalism patrols. Furthermore, I am currently trying to accept a request, but I do not have the permissions. Thanks! Ali Beary (talk2me!) (stalk me?!) 13:29, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
Hello, I've been active in the Wikipedia community adding new content and creating articles, but especially fighting vandalism. I have also gained experience in reviewing by looking and reviewing semi-protected and protected pages edit requests. I am now looking for a new challenge, and I think I could help by putting forth my skills for the pending changes reviewer role! Thanks for the consideration.TYPEINFO (talk) 06:36, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
My sole purpose of editing or the desire to review edits is for the wellbeing of Wikipedia. I made a few pages and made 1300+ edits. I believe in quality not quantity. TrueMoriarty (talk) 17:36, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
|
Requests for rollback |
---|
Rollback[edit]
Hello everyone. I would like to request rollback rights here. I have a long and controversial history on the English Wikipedia but hope that especially in recent years, I have proved as to other editors, as well to the administrators, a positive change in my editorial behavior. I myself, don't forgive and don't forget my mistakes, but believe that with my experience and knowledge on the Macedonian issue, I will be useful in the fight against vandalism in this complicated question. Even though I'm worried, I remember Matthew 7:7-8: “Ask and it will be given to you; seek and you will find; knock and the door will be opened to you. For everyone who asks receives; the one who seeks finds; and to the one who knocks, the door will be opened." Thanks. Jingiby (talk) 09:01, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
I am requesting rollback rights for the ability to use a tool-assisted diff viewer, either huggle or meta:SWViewer. I have a lot of experience doing recent changes patrolling and fighting vandals and am interested in doing so with the semi-automated tools available. I have read the policy for using rollback and always warn users when reverting their edits. cyberdog958Talk 10:49, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
Hi, I've been editing Wikipedia for about a year, with more active contributions over the past 5-6 months. i edited over 1000 edits and made some pages as well. During this time, I've frequently reverted vandalism and unconstructive edits and have become familiar with handling such challenges. While I’m still learning some aspects of Wikipedia policies, I feel that rollback rights would help me revert vandalism and const. edits more efficiently, especially when i have to do repeated cases. I’m committed to using these rights responsibly to maintain the quality of Wikipedia. Much Regards. Callmehelper (talk) 03:26, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
Hi! I've been editing for half an year (less than others I know) and have amassed a total of 1600 edits, with about half of those being in mainspace. I have patrolled recent changes for a while, and have been adequately warning users since I learned about Twinkle. Note that the block I have received was a self-block to study for finals. I want rollback permissions in order to use tools such as Huggle effectively. Wildfireupdateman :) (talk) 20:12, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
Hello. I am requesting this permission in order to fight vandalism in a faster and more efficient manner, when I encounter it in my work here (with this being one of the worst examples I've seen so far). If granted, I intend to use it responsibly (and just occasionally – when needed), in the same way as I am using other permissions that were granted to me so far. Of course, I am aware that this tool is supposed to be used, basically, just to target vandalism – not at all in content disputes, etc. As for my experience, I have been around for almost 15 years, with c. 150,000 edits. — Sundostund mppria (talk / contribs) 16:01, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
|
Requests for template editor |
---|
Template editor[edit]
Hello, Recently, I went on vacation, which has given me more time to dedicate to Wikipedia. During this period, I noticed some issues with the Dark mode theme. Inspired by user @Synpath, who took the initiative to propose changes to the Drugbox template, I began working on fixing dark mode compatibility in other templates. Specifically, I have contributed to improving Template:Annotated image 4, Template:Enzymatic reaction, and Template:Biochem reaction subunit. In 2019, I created a Lua module for the Portuguese Wikipedia to assist editors in finding articles without citations. This tool categorizes articles by the month and year the tag was added and allows sorting by pageviews. You can view the module and the associated template. I mention this to demonstrate my ability to work with modules if needed, although I currently do not intend to work on modules. The primary reason for this request is to be able to contribute more actively to the Drugbox and Chembox templates. I have previously participated in discussions to update the Brazilian drug legal status parameter in them (see: Template talk:Infobox drug/Archive 19#Legal status in Brazil - Add subclasses F1, F2 and F3 and Template talk:Chembox/Archive 13#Template-protected edit request on 15 August 2023). I am also contemplating starting a project, potentially under the umbrella of Wikipedia:WikiProject Pharmacology, to expand the "legal status" parameter to include additional countries, particularly China and India. This expansion would aim to improve greater understanding of how different countries regulate and culturally perceive various substances. Thanks! -- Arthurfragoso (talk) 17:51, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
|
I am at about 70,000 edits aross all Wiki projects.
The Minor Barnstar | ||
Minor edits make a major difference. —Gaff ταλκ 04:03, 31 May 2007 (UTC) |
The Minor Barnstar | ||
Ahh, a sigh of relief from IvoShandor to Rmhermen, thanks for your work on articles related to the Black Hawk War. IvoShandor 05:31, 20 August 2007 (UTC) |
The Original Barnstar | ||
This barnstar is for that quick and poisonous work you did on the Ayina River. Yours sincerely, GeorgeLouis (talk) 19:52, 15 November 2010 (UTC) |
Templates I use often but never remember
[edit]- {{NorthAmNative}} {{WikiProject Michigan}} {{WikiProject Protected areas}} {{river}}
- (Wikipedia:Template_messages/Image_namespace)
- {{fact}}{{no license}} {{no source}} {{or-fu-re|Image:replacementimage}} {{Orphaned fairuse not replaced or {{or-fu-nr}} *{{PD-USGov-Interior-NPS}} {{subst:deletedpage}} {{globalize/USA}}{{intro-missing}}
WP:AIV | WP:ANI | WP:NPP | WP:RPP | WP:RFR | WP:AFD | WP:XFD | |||||||||||||
CAT:CSD | WP:CSD | WP:RM | WP:RAA | WP:DR | WP:TM | WP:TT | |||||||||||||
WP:RCU | WP:LOP | CAT:AB | WP:BS | WP:RD | WP:NFC | WP:IUP |
Help box by Jennavecia (talk · contribs)
"Do you want to take a survey?"
[edit]On Feb. 12, 2005, I did a random pages survey. Out of 100 random pages, only 1 was a U.S. town. That's progress. Three towns in the UK, 1 in Spain and 1 in Portugal also turned up. Overall biographies were the largest category at 22%, followed by geography with 15% total. Then Lists at 7%, Disambiguation pages at 6%.
On Feb. 24, 2006, I repeated the 100 random page survey, this time getting 5 U.S. towns. Overall, geography had 26%, biography 21%, fiction 9%, music 4%, colleges 4%, lists 3% and disambigs 4%. Clearly geography and biography are our largest areas. Music, science and business scored less than I expected. Non-individual History was hardly discernable.
Even by Feb. 2005, 100 out of almost 500,000 was not statistically significant but was as much as I had patience for.
Wikiprojects I am a member of:
[edit]- Wikipedia:WikiProject Protected areas
- Wikipedia:WikiProject Rivers
- Wikipedia:WikiProject Space missions
- Wikipedia:WikiProject Michigan
Short To Do list
[edit]- add maps to cities in Chad
- have done ten largest plus A-Biltine (plus Doba, Faya-Largeau, Goz Beïda, Guéréda, Mao, Ouara) from List of cities in Chad
- sources for Hook and Cod wars
- History of camping
- User:Rmhermen/sandbox
- reduce repetition between Chemical Weapons Convention, Chemical weapon proliferation, Destruction of chemical weapons, Chemical weapon#Disposal and Chemical warfare
- Pueblo Chemical Depot - full destruction in Sept 2016
- Joan Walsh Anglund
Early Anon work, no need to bug the developers
[edit]Up to Dec 16, 2003, all the edits at these anonymous id's were mine (59 edits):
- User:64.152.154.140
- User:64.152.153.104
- User:166.90.233.102
- User:65.25.234.xxx
- User:64.7.163.180
- User:64.152.153.139
- User:63.212.148.98
- User:64.152.159.57
- User:64.152.154.147
More recently 1,250 or so edits on 75.41.110.200 are apparently all mine. Apparently my new ID is 75.41.109.190. There are undoubtedly many others as the earliest history of many articles was not preserved by the software.
List of most of my original pictures and some maps
[edit]For copyright declaration purposes The following photographs and diagrams on Wikipedia were taken by and uploaded by me and released under GNU-FDL:
- Update March 21, 2006 by searching with Interiot's Tool (no longer updated - [1] does edit counts though)
Pictures
[edit]Maps
[edit]- Image:Michigan map.png
- Image:Toledo Strip.png
- Image:Les Cheneaux Islands.PNG
- Image:Blackfeet Indian Reservation map.PNG
- Image:1999_west_nile_map.png, and the others in article
- Image:US execution methods.png
- Image:Lake of Egypt.PNG - an unimproved map
- Image:Upper Peninsula of Michigan.png
Numerous locator maps for U.S. national parks like Image:LocMap Big Bend National Park.png and Image:LocMap Tongariro National Park.png - most now replaced by dynamic map system